Jose F. Moreno, the left-wing Chicano Studies who ran unsuccessfully for Anaheim City Council last year, shared this post on his Facebook page shortly after Islamic State terrorists brutally executed 21 Egyptian Coptic Christians merely for being Christians:
The article Moreno shared (at some point he deleted his share from his Facebook page) is a post on the left-wing blog Daily Kos by Chauncey DeVega, a radical who sees the world through race-colored glasses (for example, he has called Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas “the greatest Uncle Tom of all time and legendary self-hating negro” and characterized actress Patricia Arquette’s feminist outburst at the Oscars as “racist comments.”) DeVega’s post is a classic exercise in America-loathing moral equivalency of the sort specialized in by denizens of the political Left. He explicitly equates the Islamic States atrocities with the brutalities committed against black Americans in the old Jim Crow South a century ago. As a result, he believes the United States lacks the moral standing to condemn the Islamic State. This is a reflex peculiar to the radical Left in American politics, which see the United States as destructive rather than beneficial force in world affairs. It’s the same mentality that believed the Cold War was the result of provocative, aggressive American policies rather than the Soviet Union and its tyrannical, expansionist, revolutionary ideology.
For racialists like DeVega, everything – law and government, arts and culture, media, the structure of society — is a structural manifestation of white racial dominance and that America is a racist nation; a bad place. So when DeVega and his kindred spirits see American leaders condemning the mass beheading of those Copts and other Islamic State atrocities, their first reaction is “Hypocrites! America is just as bad!”
That is moral blindness. Black Americans suffered horribly in the Jim Crow South. They were deprived of their inalienable rights as American citizens and it is a stain on our national story that it took a century for so many black Americans to share fully in the promises of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. But the lynchings and burning that took place were mob actions, not government policy. Indeed, they seen as horrific at the time in part because these acts were the antithesis of civilization and the principles of the American Founding. were also a source of condemnation from Americans of all colors across the country.
The beheadings of the Egyptian Copts, the burning alive of the Jordanian pilot – these are deliberate, unapologetic acts of state. They are officials acts of the Islamic State. These atrocities reflect the nature of the regime that conceived and executed them, and then broadcast them to the world. The moral difference is self-evident to ordinary people but lost on the racialist intelligentsia who have had moral sense educated out of them.
America is a good and great country in which evils have been committed; Islamic State is an evil entity, that practices evil in the name of an evil ideology. A child can see as much.
Why would Moreno share such a wretched, morally-stunted exercise in America-bashing? While he limited his comment to an ambiguous “Yikes!,” scrolling through his Facebook page makes it abundantly clear Moreno posts articles espousing viewpoints with which he agrees and wants to share with others. It’s hard to believe Moreno disagrees with Devega’s disturbing exercise in moral equivalency and the philosophical premises underpinning it – they’re part and parcel of the intellectual pond of ethnic and racial studies in our nation’s universities.

Wait, is this the “GOOD” Jose Moreno or the “EVIL” one….AGHH I get so confused…..
And this was one of Tom Tait’s candidates for council. Unbelievable.
And this was one of Tom Tait’s candidates for council. Unbelievable.
One benefit of his posting the piece is that it elicits staggeringly ignorant remarks like yours that the lynchings in the South were “mob actions” but “not government policy.” They were both: they took part not only with the forbearance, but often with the active approval and participation, of government officials such as county sheriffs.
By the way: “Islamic State” is not a “government,” so your analogy fails in both respects.
Greg, certainly they did occur with the connivance and participation of government officials. And often in opposition to government authorities (even universally segregationist authorities). That doesn’t make it government policy. That would be like saying bureaucratic sloth and inefficiency is government policy because there are slothful, inefficient government bureaucrats.
And by the way: Islamic State is a political entity that controls territory, levies taxes, fields a military establishment, adopts and enforces laws, etc. It is not a diplomatically-recognized government, but it is the government of the territory it controls.
Can we assume you share the sentiments of your fellow Daily Kos blogger?
As for the Islamic State of Syria and Assyria being a government: Why won’t you take it up with the United Nations, which is in charge of recognizing what is and is not considered a government? Or you can talk to Political Science scholars about it.
As for your writings about race: you really don’t have standing to discuss the topic.
I haven’t read the DKos article. But I do believe that Jesus had something to say about attending to the mote in another’s eye before acknowledging the log in your own. Much of what you deride as “self-hatred” is simply people following that dictum.
Personally, if I were trying to raise consciousness, I’d probably have written about the great number of beheadings carried out by our ally, customer, and pusher man Saudi Arabia, the rulers of which we have propped up for decades to facilitate our pursuit of mammon. And you probably have a problem with that too, eh?
“Why won’t you take it up with the United Nations, which is in charge of recognizing what is and is not considered a government?”
Are you really going to stand on that claim, Greg? So, for the 22 years that Taiwan represented China in the United Nations, the Beijing government was not a government at all? Then you must also believe that neither the West nor East Germany governments were actually governments until they were admitted o the UN in 1973? North and South Korea weren’t admitted until 1991 – so you must think they didn’t have governments until then?
There are other criteria as well. If you want me to prepare a proper report, it will cost you.
Thanks for apparently conceding the rest of your points, though.
I think you peaked with your previous comment, Greg. And I didn’t “concede” because my point still stands.
Congrats to the author. I don’t think I’ve ever read such sweeping generalities, guilt by association and general lack of logic.
You mus really hate this Moreno guy.
On the contrary. I admire Moreno’s rise from very modest circumstances to achieve professional success, and his obvious devotion to his family. But I deeply disagree with his political philosophy.
Nice use of the word “virulent” Senator McCarthy. Better look up the meaning of the word!
Not the most accurate word choice to convey my meaning, I agree. Now you can respond to what I said rather than fix on an ill-chosen word as a distraction.
Greg needs the money Matt. For a guy that complained to a judge about financial hardship he sure blogs a lot.
There must be some job for a Ph.d with a law degree……I heard Buffalo Wild Wings needs a bartender! Free wings too.
hmmm………
As a Native American I notice this “essay” omits any reference to the genocide perpetrated by the United States against the indigenous peoples of the continent that run the gamut from swindle and apartheid to massacre.
The USA as government policy habitually alienated our people from their “inalienable” rights.
Still no response about the US government’s hundred year policy of swindle, apartheid and genocide against Native Americans?
What was your point, again?