Tomorrow night the Anaheim City Council will vote on a resolution supporting Mayor Harry Sidhu’s $250 million 2030 Neighborhood Revitalization Program, and cement a partnership with community organization Anaheim First to implement the initiative.
Sidhu proposed the ambitious neighborhood investment program during his inaugural State of the City speech in February – beginning with a $20 million investment in the 2019-2020 fiscal year that starts this July. Sidhu’s vision is to harness the robust tax revenues generated by economic development and tourism in Anaheim to resident-driven investment priorities. To that end, the mayor proposes partnering with Anaheim First, a resident and neighborhood based community organization.
What Is Anaheim First?
Anaheim First is a partnership among the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, Visit Anaheim and the Anaheim Community Foundation. It’s self-stated goal:
This program is focused on resident-driven solutions that positively transform our neighborhoods — led by your neighbors in partnership with city officials, business, and community leaders. ANAHEI’M FIRST is the premier, game-changing initiative that will be implemented as part of the proposed 2030 Neighborhood Revitalization Program announced by Anaheim Mayor Harry Sidhu at his inaugural 2019 State of the City address. ANAHEI’M FIRST, in partnership with the City of Anaheim, is planning to conduct a comprehensive Anaheim Community Assessment to launch this program.
Organizationally, Anaheim First is led by a Neighborhood Leadership Council comprised of 100 residents: 15 from each of the city’s six council districts who are representative of each district’s socioeconomic and cultural makeup – plus an additional 10 members drawn from Anaheim businesses, nonprofit organizations, and community representatives. The intent is for the Leadership Council to serve as a bridge among neighborhoods, City officials, and community stakeholders, and connect residents with “all aspects of the [2030 Neighborhood Revitalization] program, including development of significant new infrastructure, expanded police and fire services, programs to maintain a strong local economy, and continuous reinvestment to build and maintain vibrant neighborhoods citywide.”
Anaheim Community Assessment
The first order of business in this partnership would be conducting an Anaheim Community Assessment, which the organization’s website describes as “a multidisciplinary review of the districts and neighborhoods in Anaheim, leading to a comprehensive community needs assessment and strategic plan of implementation to improve the vitality and livability of the entire Anaheim community”:
The assessment will start by developing a foundation of service levels and what defines adequate service in all elements of Anaheim life. Topics will include: neighborhood livability, housing availability, public safety, assistance for those who are homeless, quality of streets and roads, parks, wildlands and open space, mobility and accessibility, commercial vitality and connectivity, recreation and leisure, programs to support local hiring and job training, and continuous investment and redevelopment to build and maintain vibrant neighborhoods citywide.
The resolution before the city council calls on the city to provide $250,000 to supplement matching private sector funding to conduct the assessment.
Anaheim’s economy generates hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue every year. This is a consequence of a robust local economy – and did not happen by accident. It’s the result of decades of constructive partnership between the private sector and civic leadership. One salient effect of this productive collaboration is Anaheim – unlike a growing number of its neighbors – doesn’t have to resort to tax increases to maintain public services. It has the wherewithal to embark on an ambitious program to invest a quarter of a billion dollars in its neighborhoods over the course of a decade.
Mayor Sidhu’s proposal is innovative and bold, but not without precedence in Anaheim. In the late 1950s, city leaders convened a group of 100 residents to brainstorm ideas on how the city could provide the proper quality of life to residents at a time when the city – like the rest of Orange County – was experiencing tremendous growth.
Anaheim First is a refreshing, grass-roots approach to giving citizens a more direct and impactful voice in prioritizing the city’s neighborhood investments. It isn’t political. There are no partisan or ideological litmus tests to becoming involved in Anaheim First. Improving neighborhoods, parks, libraries and services for youth, seniors and families isn’t partisan.
Anaheim First isn’t about telling other people what to do, or using city government to impose a particular agenda. It’s about empowering Anaheim residents, giving them a say in how their city government allocates and invest the public’s money in the legitimate ends of local government: civic upkeep, infrastructure, community services, quality of life and neighborhood vitality. It’s driven by residents of all stripes and walks of life who care enough to step up and work to improve their neighborhoods and city. This is the kind of public-private partnership that has been a hallmark of Anaheim’s forward progress over the decades, and promises to be a productive collaboration that will yield positive results for the people of Anaheim.
Turnover tax dollars to 100 unelected people.
Every paid political hack’s wet dream.
Here’s a Civics 101 lesson for you: only the city council can allocate city funds. If you have something against the organized involvement of active residents in establishing neighborhood investment priorities for the city, then just say so.
At what point did you stop being able to call a turd a turd?
This is a turd of an idea. Only one who laid it could possibly call it responsible governance.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion. And you certainly have yours.
Perhaps you can move beyond insults and into intelligent argumentation.
Nothing about law enforcement to immediately permanently remove criminal street gangs and hold parents accountable. Great.
IMO, Anaheim’s current approach at housing in will ghetto the communities in 2 decades and double population.
Thank you Matt for a truthful and well written article.
I am looking forward to what’s to come. And close the chapter on the past.
Let’s go Anaheim First!
Guaranteed that Jose Moreno and his minions will attack this proposal tonight. They’ll try to falsely smear Anaheim First members as political partisans.
The real reason Moreno and his left-wing allies oppose Anaheim First is they don’t control it. In their eyes, any community-based organization that doesn’t follow their progressive agenda is illegitimate. That’s why Moreno and his goon squad like Joese Hernandez, Wes Jones and the rest of that bunch will attack it as “Astro-Turf.” It’s called “projection” because those clowns are the real Astroturfers.
The neighborhoods closest to the Disneyland Resort district have the issues. Those that live in Anaheim Hills are further removed. They can’t all live in Anaheim Hills. Some places are horrible for a reason. Not every place is capable of being saved. Just make the patient comfortable.
Has anybody heard of”let’s see if the idea works? I think community involvement is vital in all of Anaheim. The roads in some areas are horrible, fix them, graffiti, well pick up a brush and cover it. City will even give you the paint. Euclid is a mess. How about some planning there? Let’s see if the community will come up with some ideas on how and where to spend.
The name of the organization hides and covers up the true purpose of the group; that is to promote the interests of large corporations in Anaheim (the Resort District). Those who serve on the Advisory and Neighborhood Councils have unknowingly become pawns of the Mayor, the Chamber of Commerce and Visit Anaheim. The organization will not tolerate valid criticism and proposals that put the interests of the community before the interest of large corporations. Large corporations have one motivation: profit for their shareholders. Democracy has a different agenda though not as efficient as corporations; that is representation for all. Democracy is messy, slow, and inefficient, but it is the hallmark of our American way of life.