At its October 23 meeting, the Anaheim Elementary School District Board of Education voted unanimously for a resolutions of support for a proposed ballot initiative that would strip Proposition 13 protections from commercial property. If the initiative qualifies for the ballot and passes, it would result in massive increases in commercial property taxes, which would be passed on to small businesses and consumers in the form of higher rents and prices.
The anti-Prop. 13 initiative is euphemistically dubbed the “In Support of the Schools and Local Communities First Funding Act” by its sponsors, primarily the California Teachers Association (CTA) – considered the most powerful political special interest group in the state. It is more commonly known as the “split roll” initiative, since it would “split” the property tax roll between commercial and residential property and tax them differently.
The initiative would require commercial and industrial properties every three years, and would heap billions in higher taxes on property owners and businesses in what is already one of the most highly-taxes states in the Union.
Although initiative proponents claim to have included protections for small businesses, they’re flimsy at best. Most small businesses operate under “triple net” leases in which they – not the property owner – pays the property taxes, maintenance and insurance costs. When the owner of the local Michoacán ice cream franchise find his rent spiked after his landlord get socked with massively higher property tax bill, that increase is passed on to customers in the form of higher prices – assuming the rent increase doesn’t force the owner to close his doors, that is.
As the California Taxpayers Association notes:
“Higher property taxes on businesses mean higher prices for consumers on everything we buy, including gasoline, groceries, diapers, clothes and utilities. California already has the highest percentage of population living in poverty, and suffers from the nation’s third-highest cost of living. The split-roll property tax will only make things worse. However, that’s not what signature gatherers will tell you when they approach you at your local grocery store.”
Ultimately, the only way for business tenants to escape the higher rents driven by this initiative will relocation to states with lower tax burdens.
The massive property tax increases that would follow passage of the split-roll translate into lost jobs and fewer hours available for remaining employees.
Ryan Ruelas, president of the AESD Board of Education, expresses his enthusiasm for passage of the split-roll initiative.
“All I have to say is that I’m super excited that we’re behind this and we’re showing full support,” said Ruelas when joining his colleagues in supporting the effort to raise property taxes. Ruelas is a member of the State Council of the CTA, the initiative’s principal funder. Ruelas – who describes himself as “a union guy through and through” – is also considered likely to run against Councilman Steve Faessel in District 5 in 2020.
Joining Ruelas in supporting the proposed property tax increase were fellow trustees J. Paolo Magcalas, Juan Alvarez, Mark Lopez and Jackie Filbeck.
Magcalas and Filbeck are both up for re-election in November 2020.
While the AESD’s endorsement of the split-roll property tax initiative is partially based on the notion that more funding equals better academic achievement, the reality is there’s little evidence to support that claim. Indeed, student test scores in California have stagnated in recent years even as per-pupil spending has increased by 50%.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, California ranks 20th in the nation in terms of per-pupil spending. Yet, states like Utah and Idaho – which rank near the bottom nationally in per-pupil spending – have far better educational outcomes for their students.
While the public school establishment claims Prop. 13 has starved schools of revenue, the reality is state property tax revenues are 15 times higher now than when Proposition 13 was passed in 1978. The problems affecting public education in California stem from bureaucratic red tape, rigid rules and over powerful teachers unions – not insufficient funding.
Leaving that argument aside, its doubtful much of the funding resulting from the proposed property tax increase would even wind up in the classroom. According to a study by the California Assessors Association, it could cost as much as $696 million annually to implement the split-roll initiative.
The political reality is this split-roll initiative is nothing more than a money grab by powerful government unions with an insatiable appetite for tax money. The pension and benefit packages negotiated by the teachers unions are consuming huge chunks of school district budgets, crowding out funding for educational programs, and facilities maintenance and construction. CalSTRS – the state teachers pension system – has an unfunded liability of $107 billion.
Rather than undertaking necessary reforms, the CTA and its allies prefers to raise taxes on the people of California.
CalTax President Robert Gutierrez accurately observes, “This measure is the first step in repealing Proposition 13 and increasing property taxes on homeowners.”
He’s right. The split-roll initiative is a two-step strategy of divide-and-conquer by separating the currently united interests of residential and commercial property owners. If this initiative passes, the business community has no incentive to fund political action to protect Proposition 13 – leaving unorganized, individual homeowners alone to face a follow-up initiative to strip away their Proposition 13 taxes.
The appetite of public employee unions for more taxes is boundless. The CTA, in particular, hates Proposition 13. Anyone who doesn’t think the unions next target is Prop. 13 limits on residential property taxes is living in a fool’s paradise.
AESD Board of Education Is Controlled By The Teachers Union
The Anaheim Elementary School District Board of Education is completely dominated by teachers union activists employed by the Anaheim Union High School District:
- Ruelas is a member of the CTA State Council
- Alvarez is an officer of the Anaheim Secondary Teachers Association
- Lopez is a new AUSHD teacher on the union activism fast-track, recently journeying to Texas for the National Education Association annual union meeting.
- Magcalas is another union activist, and teaches Ethnic Studies at Loara High School.
One has to wonder if any of these gentlemen, before they voted to support the split-roll property tax initiative, gave any thought to the harmful impacts it will have on small business owners, consumers and their families – in other words, the families they represent and serve.
They want us to dump *more* money into failing schools? Absurd. It’s the camel’s nose under the tent. They’re coming after commercial properties today. They’re coming after you tomorrow.
Money does NOT increase scores
GOOD TEACHING improves scores. Teachers should be well-paid and have access to copy psper and computers. . If that was all i could have, my students would still fare well. Done and done. The rest is up to me. May i suggest taxes be raised in the cities which these supporters live? – a teacher
No more money should go to these raiders who produce failing schools. The schools need to be audited. Where does all the money go? Has the money already entrusted to the administration produced deliverables? The deliverables are FAILING scores. Then this group has the audacity to cry poor and that they need more? HOW IS THE MONEY SPENT THAT THEY HAVE BEEN GIVEN?
Who has benefited from a good portion of the money, this group. They continue to fail our kids and then want us to pay more so it can continue?
Where has all the money gone?
Whoa.i said money coming from local taxes to raise scores. No more taxes.. However, it takes a great deal of money to run the district itself. Salaries, maintenance, extra curricular activities, busses, sipport staff, and so on. Give it a little thought before you speak.
Teachers do not fail students. We work our asses off and spend a great deal of our own time to get everything asked of us done. Many of these kids come to us with low skills and difficult backgrounds , and you blame us? If you had even an inkling of what I put into this job…shame on you for judging without any knowledge of the situation.
Walk a mile in my shoes before you talk about teachers failing kids. Because you don’t have a clue what it’s like to be a teacher today.
I don’t want to argue the slant of calling this a “money grab.”
I’d love to hear the opposition plan for helping fund public schools.
I know a lot of people who don’t have children in public schools anymore don’t seem to care as much, but thoughts and prayers aren’t working.
So it would be great if this platform could/would be used to come up with feasible solutions.
Eugene: do you believe the California public school system is insufficiently funded? In other words, do you believe it cannot provide quality education with current funding?
Frankly, I think the burden of proof lies not on the targets of this proposed tax hike, but on the special interests who have controlled public education policy in this state for decades to justify their latest attempt at a huge tax increase.
Those two questions are separate from each other.
I do believe that the California public school system is under-funded.
I also believe that it is difficult – not impossible – to provide quality education at the current levels of funding.
There are several reasons for this – special interest groups at the state, county and local levels being a large part of it.
Issues like public education have been turned into partisan finger-pointing, when this issue – and a few others – are distinctly nonpartisan, in my opinion.
We need more people with a platform and voice calling for fundamental change, rather than using said platform to rail about what’s wrong in the world.
We’re past due for leaders in whatever space they occupy to come up with solutions.
If they are underfunded, then what is the magic number? What is the per-pupil figure that will do the trick?
Constantly demanding more money – which has been the mantra of the public education establishment for decades – isn’t a policy. And it clearly hasn’t worked.